Kurok PSP errors

[Max_Salivan]

Hello,can something help me with engine?

my friend done some features for flitzkurok PC engine,and i want add it in kurok psp engine

if i compile it,i have a errors

http://rghost.ru/36531975

[Baker]

List of errors?

[Max_Salivan]

List of errors?

all errors are

qboolean does no name a type


http://savepic.su/1343096.htm

[Baker]

In common.h ...

You have ...

Code: Select all

#if !defined BYTE_DEFINED
typedef unsigned char       byte;
#define BYTE_DEFINED 1
#endif

#undef true
#undef false

typedef enum {false, true}   qboolean;

But this needs to be ...

Code: Select all

#if !defined BYTE_DEFINED
typedef unsigned char       byte;
#define BYTE_DEFINED 1
#endif

#undef true
#undef false

#if defined(PSP) && defined(__cplusplus)  // <---------------------
typedef enum {qfalse, qtrue}   qboolean; // <---------------------------
#else // <-----------------------------------------------------------------
typedef enum {false, true}   qboolean;
#endif // <--------------------------------------------------

The PSP C++ files hates the qboolean datatype. So the above is required to work around the issue.

[Max_Salivan]

In common.h ...

You have ...

Code: Select all

#if !defined BYTE_DEFINED
typedef unsigned char       byte;
#define BYTE_DEFINED 1
#endif

#undef true
#undef false

typedef enum {false, true}   qboolean;

But this needs to be ...

Code: Select all

#if !defined BYTE_DEFINED
typedef unsigned char       byte;
#define BYTE_DEFINED 1
#endif

#undef true
#undef false

#if defined(PSP) && defined(__cplusplus)  // <---------------------
typedef enum {qfalse, qtrue}   qboolean; // <---------------------------
#else // <-----------------------------------------------------------------
typedef enum {false, true}   qboolean;
#endif // <--------------------------------------------------

The PSP C++ files hates the qboolean datatype. So the above is required to work around the issue.

arr-_-
http://savepic.su/1318524.htm

[Baker]

in common.h add ...

#define bound(a, b, c) ((a) >= (c) ? (a) : (b) < (a) ? (a) : (b) > (c) ? (c) : (b))

[Max_Salivan]

in common.h add ...

#define bound(a, b, c) ((a) >= (c) ? (a) : (b) < (a) ? (a) : (b) > (c) ? (c) : (b))

more errors

http://savepic.su/1311344.htm

[Baker]

You'll probably have to open mathlib.h and mathlib.c and copy RotatePointAroundVector and VectorVectors into your new mathlib.h and mathlib.c

The function is missing.

[Max_Salivan]

You'll probably have to open mathlib.h and mathlib.c and copy RotatePointAroundVector and VectorVectors into your new mathlib.h and mathlib.c

The function is missing.

ok,but i have new errors
http://savepic.su/1400255.htm

[Baker]

ok,but i have new errors

Replace existing function in mathlib.c:

I don't know how to make ASM work on a PSP. But this will make the function work.

The ASM will still compile on the PC version, but for the PSP it will use native floating point functions.

Code: Select all

/*
=================
SinCos
=================
*/
void SinCos( float radians, float *sine, float *cosine )
{
#if defined(PSP)
   *sine   = sinf (radians);
   *cosine = cosf (radians);
#else   
   _asm
   {
      fld   dword ptr [radians]
      fsincos

      mov edx, dword ptr [cosine]
      mov eax, dword ptr [sine]

      fstp dword ptr [edx]
      fstp dword ptr [eax]
   }
#endif
}

[revelator]

i think it uses gnu intel syntax, so basically the same gcc uses.
ill see if i can find something about it.

[revelator]

yep its standard x86 asm intel syntax so you can use a number of tools like nasm or gcc's own gas the syntax differs from ms format though so you might have to read up a bit on the differences. intels assembler should work to

[Baker]

I'm not so sure about that for a PSP. The PSP ASM I've seen doesn't look like that.

Looks like:

Code: Select all

asm __volatile__ ("\n\
ori $5,$0,0\n\
ori $17,$0,0\n\
loop:\n\
mul %1,%2\n\
mflo $16\n\

And he posted that the ASM code was giving him an error during the compile (in the screenshot). The PSP uses a MIPS processor. I also kind of think that the ASM in question is only a modest improvement over what a C compiler would probably do with that code. It's just calling a standard math function and returning it, it isn't like it is doing some wild and crazy span drawing stuff.

[Max_Salivan]

I'm not so sure about that for a PSP. The PSP ASM I've seen doesn't look like that.

Looks like:

Code: Select all

asm __volatile__ ("\n\
ori $5,$0,0\n\
ori $17,$0,0\n\
loop:\n\
mul %1,%2\n\
mflo $16\n\

And he posted that the ASM code was giving him an error during the compile (in the screenshot). The PSP uses a MIPS processor. I also kind of think that the ASM in question is only a modest improvement over what a C compiler would probably do with that code. It's just calling a standard math function and returning it, it isn't like it is doing some wild and crazy span drawing stuff.

thanks for information)

i have a new errors-_-

http://savepic.su/1437126.htm


UPD:i am compile it
added
#define FL_MONSTERCLIP 8192 // Only solid to entities with FL_MONSTER


but doors and buttons dont work,i am pass through them

[revelator]

i know its a mips but various sites state that its standard x86 asm hmm ? though that asm code looks a bit weird. it does resemble intel asm a bit but without the \n\ newlines also i dont recognize the ori calls. mul is pretty standard though and im not sure about mflo. codewarrior has a compiler/assembler for mips but its not free i think i wonder if rtems has one.