WTF of the day
Moderator: InsideQC Admins
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
WTF of the day
I've spent about three nights in a row trying to figure out how i'm corrupting memory in the tempentity list... even when i remove the code i added, it still crashes spectacularly. On the other hand, sometimes it works fine and i figured it must be a compiler bug.
Until just now, when i discovered something peculiar in CL_UpdateTEnts -- there is a for loop inside another for loop, and both loops use the variable "i" as their iterator. Anyway, here's the code (100% pure id software code), see for yourself:
My guess is that the memory immediately after cl_beams[] is usually full of zeros, and that's why it usually works.
Until just now, when i discovered something peculiar in CL_UpdateTEnts -- there is a for loop inside another for loop, and both loops use the variable "i" as their iterator. Anyway, here's the code (100% pure id software code), see for yourself:
- Code: Select all
void CL_UpdateTEnts (void)
{
int i;
beam_t *b;
vec3_t dist, org;
float d;
entity_t *ent;
float yaw, pitch;
float forward;
num_temp_entities = 0;
// update lightning
for (i=0, b=cl_beams ; i< MAX_BEAMS ; i++, b++)
{
if (!b->model || b->endtime < cl.time)
continue;
// if coming from the player, update the start position
if (b->entity == cl.viewentity)
{
VectorCopy (cl_entities[cl.viewentity].origin, b->start);
}
// calculate pitch and yaw
VectorSubtract (b->end, b->start, dist);
if (dist[1] == 0 && dist[0] == 0)
{
yaw = 0;
if (dist[2] > 0)
pitch = 90;
else
pitch = 270;
}
else
{
yaw = (int) (atan2(dist[1], dist[0]) * 180 / M_PI);
if (yaw < 0)
yaw += 360;
forward = sqrt (dist[0]*dist[0] + dist[1]*dist[1]);
pitch = (int) (atan2(dist[2], forward) * 180 / M_PI);
if (pitch < 0)
pitch += 360;
}
// add new entities for the lightning
VectorCopy (b->start, org);
d = VectorNormalize(dist);
while (d > 0)
{
ent = CL_NewTempEntity ();
if (!ent)
return;
VectorCopy (org, ent->origin);
ent->model = b->model;
ent->angles[0] = pitch;
ent->angles[1] = yaw;
ent->angles[2] = rand()%360;
for (i=0 ; i<3 ; i++)
org[i] += dist[i]*30;
d -= 30;
}
}
}
My guess is that the memory immediately after cl_beams[] is usually full of zeros, and that's why it usually works.
- metlslime
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:03 pm
Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh.
I had the very same last week (made worse by the fact that I no longer had any memory after cl_beams...) and kinda hacked around it by doing a check for "if (cl.time < 0.0001) return;" at the start, as it only seemed to happen at a changelevel. I was never really happy with that solution, so I'm looking forward to trying this out and seeing if it resolves anything.
Thankingyew!
I had the very same last week (made worse by the fact that I no longer had any memory after cl_beams...) and kinda hacked around it by doing a check for "if (cl.time < 0.0001) return;" at the start, as it only seemed to happen at a changelevel. I was never really happy with that solution, so I'm looking forward to trying this out and seeing if it resolves anything.
Thankingyew!
We had the power, we had the space, we had a sense of time and place
We knew the words, we knew the score, we knew what we were fighting for
We knew the words, we knew the score, we knew what we were fighting for
-

mh - Posts: 2292
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:38 am
I didn't realise that was in the original code.
That one caught me out too - I thought it was my own bug!
That one caught me out too - I thought it was my own bug!
- Spike
- Posts: 2892
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:12 am
- Location: UK
yep had same.
using the same var in two for loops works in old mode c++ where
for could be declared like this for (int i; i<something;i++) {rest of stuff where the int i is conciled}
then another for (int i; i = something; i--) {stuff here doesnt see the above int}
but i discovered later compilers dont like this method at all and prefers seperate descriptors.
for an example try compiling the blood2 client code with msvc 2005 it will bitch like hell and refuse to link
using the same var in two for loops works in old mode c++ where
for could be declared like this for (int i; i<something;i++) {rest of stuff where the int i is conciled}
then another for (int i; i = something; i--) {stuff here doesnt see the above int}
but i discovered later compilers dont like this method at all and prefers seperate descriptors.
for an example try compiling the blood2 client code with msvc 2005 it will bitch like hell and refuse to link
-

revelator - Posts: 2567
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:04 pm
- Location: inside tha debugger
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest