Forum

Some Modeling for Quake Questions

Discuss the creation of various model formats for Quake engines, and related matters to modeling.

Moderator: InsideQC Admins

Some Modeling for Quake Questions

Postby Mexicouger » Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:15 pm

I have a few questions regarding Modeling in Blender for Quake. I have the exporter, it's all good. So now my Questions:

1. Is there a reference .blend file or something I can import into blender to compare V_ and regular model sizes?

2. When animating a model, Do I go by 1 individual frame(Because by default it is set to end at 250). And if so, do I start on Frame 2 to be correct(Beings that Quake subtracts 1 or something similar).

3. Does the size of the texture impact The framerate quite a bit? Say I have a 328x256 image. Will that just be wasting my framerate?

And that is all my questions for now. Thanks!
User avatar
Mexicouger
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 10:12 pm

Postby dreadlorde » Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:43 pm

I think textures need to be powers of two, so 328 wouldn't work. I could be wrong.
Ken Thompson wrote:One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code.

Get off my lawn!
User avatar
dreadlorde
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:20 am

Postby metlslime » Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:06 am

quake model textures don't need to be powers of two, but glquake and many derivative engines do a poor job of resampling them when they are not.

They do need to be multiples of 16 i think? Not sure about that.

And i'm not sure but it might be the case that software engines can't handle skins taller than 200? (MAX_LBM_HEIGHT or something?)
metlslime
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:03 pm

Postby Mexicouger » Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:43 am

What about memory. What is the risk of using a bigger image for a model. Costs/benefits. And Textures can be 256x256(Which exceeds 200)
User avatar
Mexicouger
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 10:12 pm

Postby jim » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:53 am

I think that all depends what kind of computer you're using. 256*256 doesn't sound much for a modern computer to handle.
zbang!
User avatar
jim
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:35 pm
Location: In The Sun

Postby Mexicouger » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:21 am

jim wrote:I think that all depends what kind of computer you're using. 256*256 doesn't sound much for a modern computer to handle.


I am working on the PSP, Not PC.
User avatar
Mexicouger
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 10:12 pm

Postby andrewj » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:37 am

metlslime wrote:quake model textures don't need to be powers of two, but glquake and many derivative engines do a poor job of resampling them when they are not.

Do skins need to be resampled though? I thought that UV coords need to stay inside the texture (not cross any edges), and hence padding a skin texture would be both quicker and look better.

You're right that there are some limits for software Quake, but I don't remember them either (I think the width multiple is either 4 or 8 ).
andrewj
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:29 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Sajt » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:26 pm

andrewj wrote:
metlslime wrote:quake model textures don't need to be powers of two, but glquake and many derivative engines do a poor job of resampling them when they are not.

Do skins need to be resampled though? I thought that UV coords need to stay inside the texture (not cross any edges), and hence padding a skin texture would be both quicker and look better.


You're right, but if I'm not mistaken GLQuake resamples DOWN to power of two instead of up. :|
F. A. Špork, an enlightened nobleman and a great patron of art, had a stately Baroque spa complex built on the banks of the River Labe.
Sajt
 
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:39 am

Postby Mexicouger » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:00 pm

Will someone send me a file I can import into Blender to test proportions?
User avatar
Mexicouger
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 10:12 pm

Postby metlslime » Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:47 am

andrewj wrote:
metlslime wrote:quake model textures don't need to be powers of two, but glquake and many derivative engines do a poor job of resampling them when they are not.

Do skins need to be resampled though? I thought that UV coords need to stay inside the texture (not cross any edges), and hence padding a skin texture would be both quicker and look better.


Yes, padding is better, but glquake and many derivatives resample instead.

But the guy now reveals he's been talking about PSP the whole time, so who knows what the PSP engines do...
metlslime
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:03 pm

Postby Sajt » Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:55 pm

GLQuake probably resamples because old video cards had a limit of 256x256 texture size, and some models would have had to pad up to 512 width.
F. A. Špork, an enlightened nobleman and a great patron of art, had a stately Baroque spa complex built on the banks of the River Labe.
Sajt
 
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:39 am

Postby ceriux » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:42 pm

just use qme to export the model you want to scale yours to fit. i believe it should export to a format you can import.
User avatar
ceriux
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:30 pm
Location: Indiana, USA


Return to Modeling

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest