Adding CSQC Support To The Quake Engine

Team Xlink · Post by **Team Xlink** » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:49 pm

Under Construction.

Team Xlink · Post by **Team Xlink** » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:53 pm

Under Construction.

Spirit · Post by **Spirit** » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:37 am

Is this a wordy diff between original engine versus Spike's implentation or are there some things worth mentioning?

Baker · Post by **Baker** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:49 am

Spirit wrote:Is this a wordy diff between original engine versus Spike's implentation or are there some things worth mentioning?

Either way it is a interesting quick browse especially if you are trying size up the effort required to do it.

Spike · Post by **Spike** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:57 pm

Can't fault the changes to winquake.dsp at least.
*cough* :)
(it would have been more practical to state the files that were added, and the additional precompiler define, as this would carry over to other versions of msvc).

Still, the patch would be simpler if it didn't contain the server parts too.

Baker · Post by **Baker** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:17 pm

Spike wrote:Can't fault the changes to winquake.dsp at least.
*cough*
(it would have been more practical to state the files that were added, and the additional precompiler define, as this would carry over to other versions of msvc).

Still, the patch would be simpler if it didn't contain the server parts too.

Better than average chance there are a whole fleet of engine builds supporting this modification by Friday morning

Like as in all the NQ ones that anyone uses that [that I am able to compile].

goldenboy · Post by **goldenboy** » Mon May 31, 2010 8:17 am

Smart move deleting the original post.

Disable the edit button, please...

Urre · Post by **Urre** » Mon May 31, 2010 8:59 am

Yes, edit should only exist a limited time after posting, like a couple of hours tops.

ChubbyPooh · Post by **ChubbyPooh** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:02 am

Urre wrote:Yes, edit should only exist a limited time after posting, like a couple of hours tops.

yeah i agree on it.

it is not fair if it will be post

for a long period of time.

1 day would be enough.

Spirit · Post by **Spirit** » Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:18 am

Those "blogs" might look legit at the first glance, but they are obviously plain spam if you think for a moment. Please delete that user.

gnounc · Post by **gnounc** » Sat Oct 02, 2010 5:17 am

And if you get around to it, you can check our member list by join date descending and a cursory glance at every member with a home page should be enough. Nearly ever single one is a spammer waiting to post. . . please.

ceriux · Post by **ceriux** » Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:50 am

i want this tutorial!

Team Xlink · Post by **Team Xlink** » Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:02 pm

ceriux wrote:i want this tutorial!

Wow, I didn't even know this thread was still here, I thought it got removed a while ago.

I've restarted the tutorial numerous times, and I always lose the files.

ceriux · Post by **ceriux** » Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:04 pm

Sweet! (i hate to ask. but could you add in the extra steps to add it into fitzquake?)

Team Xlink · Post by **Team Xlink** » Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:34 pm

ceriux wrote:Sweet! (i hate to ask. but could you add in the extra steps to add it into fitzquake?)

Well, all this tutorial is was a wordy diff between Spike's CSQC WinQuake and GLQuake, to be honest it be a lot better to just use winmerge to implement it, this would be even better for customized engines, you could view the exact changes.

InsideQC Forums

Adding CSQC Support To The Quake Engine

Adding CSQC Support To The Quake Engine

It cut it off, had to make two posts.