Adding CSQC Support To The Quake Engine

[Team Xlink]

Under Construction.

[Team Xlink]

Under Construction.

[Spirit]

Is this a wordy diff between original engine versus Spike's implentation or are there some things worth mentioning?

[Baker]

Is this a wordy diff between original engine versus Spike's implentation or are there some things worth mentioning?

Either way it is a interesting quick browse especially if you are trying size up the effort required to do it.

[Spike]

Can't fault the changes to winquake.dsp at least.
*cough* :)
(it would have been more practical to state the files that were added, and the additional precompiler define, as this would carry over to other versions of msvc).

Still, the patch would be simpler if it didn't contain the server parts too.

[Baker]

Can't fault the changes to winquake.dsp at least.
*cough*
(it would have been more practical to state the files that were added, and the additional precompiler define, as this would carry over to other versions of msvc).

Still, the patch would be simpler if it didn't contain the server parts too.

Better than average chance there are a whole fleet of engine builds supporting this modification by Friday morning

Like as in all the NQ ones that anyone uses that [that I am able to compile].

[goldenboy]

Smart move deleting the original post.

Disable the edit button, please...

[Urre]

Yes, edit should only exist a limited time after posting, like a couple of hours tops.

[ChubbyPooh]

Yes, edit should only exist a limited time after posting, like a couple of hours tops.

yeah i agree on it.

it is not fair if it will be post

for a long period of time.

1 day would be enough.

[Spirit]

Those "blogs" might look legit at the first glance, but they are obviously plain spam if you think for a moment. Please delete that user.

[gnounc]

And if you get around to it, you can check our member list by join date descending and a cursory glance at every member with a home page should be enough. Nearly ever single one is a spammer waiting to post. . . please.

[ceriux]

i want this tutorial!

[Team Xlink]

i want this tutorial!

Wow, I didn't even know this thread was still here, I thought it got removed a while ago.

I've restarted the tutorial numerous times, and I always lose the files.

[ceriux]

Sweet! (i hate to ask. but could you add in the extra steps to add it into fitzquake?)

[Team Xlink]

Sweet! (i hate to ask. but could you add in the extra steps to add it into fitzquake?)

Well, all this tutorial is was a wordy diff between Spike's CSQC WinQuake and GLQuake, to be honest it be a lot better to just use winmerge to implement it, this would be even better for customized engines, you could view the exact changes.